The UK High Court on Wednesday upheld the claims of India in the 70 years old £35 million fund that is being held by the National Westminster Bank in London.
Pakistan has lost the decades-old Hyderabad fund case that involves India, Pakistan and descendants of the late 7th Nizam of Hyderabad, who sent £1 million to a London bank in 1948, now estimated to value at least £35 million.
The case has gone through several twists, with India and the descendants on the same side against Pakistan, which claims the money on the ground that it was a gift to the people of the country, or payment for helping the Hyderabad state during India’s annexation in 1948.
The Fund had been held in the account of the High Commissioner of Pakistan to the UK Rahimtoola since September 1948.
It had been the subject of earlier proceedings in 1950s in which the UK House of Lords set aside proceedings brought by the 7th Nizam of Hyderabad claiming the Fund as Pakistan invoked state immunity, an MEA statement said.
In 2013, Pakistan commenced fresh proceedings herself, thereby waiving state immunity. A subsequent attempt by Pakistan to discontinue the proceedings was rejected as an abuse of process by the UK Court.
“The Court (high court of England and Wales) has issued a wide-ranging judgment today after analysing documentation going back more than 70 years and embracing the law of constructive and resulting trusts, unjust enrichment, foreign act of state, illegality and limitation of actions”.
The Court rejected arguments advanced by Pakistan that the dispute was non-justiciable, either in whole or in part; that the doctrine of illegality somehow barred recovery; or that the claims of other parties were time barred. The Court held that Pakistan’s pleading of limitation was an “abuse of process”, and that remedies in trust law and restitution were available against both Pakistan and the Bank.
In the judgment today, the UK High Court has rejected Pakistan’s claim that the Fund had been intended as payment for arms shipments or as an outright gift, the statement said.
The Court has held that beneficial ownership in the Fund as at 1948 lay with the 7th Nizam, and that it had been held on trust to his benefit and that of his successors in title since then.
Having found that the 7th Nizam was beneficially entitled to the Fund, the Court concluded that those claiming in right of the 7th Nizam that is India and the two grandsons of Nizam were now entitled to have the Fund. (UNI)
